The framework of CSC's climate governance is directly supervised by the Board of Directors, the top climate governance unit; the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee is the management unit. The Sustainable Environment Development Team and Risk Management Team of the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, composed of vice presidents of departments as conveners, are responsible for handling climate change issues faced by CSC and report their progress to the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee regularly based on the implementation results.
In response to carbon neutrality, the Task Force on Energy Saving & Carbon Reduction and Carbon Neutrality was established in February 2021 by CSC. The chairman of the Board is in charge of the oversight of climate change issues. The task force convenes quarterly and reports its progress to the Board of Directors regularly.
Dates | Summaries of progress |
---|---|
2021.02.26 |
|
2021.04.22 |
|
2021.06.21 |
|
2021.08.31 |
|
2021.10.27 |
|
2022.01.04 |
|
2022.02.22 |
|
2022.04.18 |
|
2022.07.20 |
|
2022.10.25 |
|
2023.01.12 |
|
2023.04.17 |
|
2023.07.26 |
|
2023.10.25 |
|
2024.01.30 |
|
2024.04.15 |
|
2024.07.04 |
|
Following the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), CSC has identified the risks and opportunities brought about by climate change in various departments, and then effectively responded to a wide range of issues derived from climate change. Climate-related risks have been integrated into CSC's overall risk management framework. The following is a detailed description of the procedures for identifying major climate change risks and opportunities:
CSC referenced the research report proposed by the International Energy Agency (IEA) to discuss our transition plan based on the evolving technological pathways within the global steel industry and potential external market changes. We examine the parameters of the Net Zero Emissions (NZE) and Announced Pledges Scenarios (APS) separately. Continuing our previous framework for transition risk scenario analysis, CSC approaches from the perspectives of various stakeholders, taking into account the actions these stakeholders might take in different scenarios. This approach aims to proactively address potential risks or seize emerging market opportunities. A detailed framework for transition risk scenario analysis by CSC is depicted in the figure below:
CSC conducts scenario analysis of future occurrences of more frequent physical risks in the value chain, utilizing scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), specifically the high emissions scenario (SSP5-8.5) and the intermediate emissions scenario (SSP2-4.5). Leveraging the climate impact driver framework employed by IPCC Working Group I, CSC identifies physical risks that the value chain may encounter. Based on climate scenario data and information on hazard risk, combined with assessment results from various locations, these values are consolidated into a climate risk matrix. CSC’s analysis process of physical risks is as follows:
Order of Priority | Category | Risk Factor |
---|---|---|
1 | Market | Transition of raw materials. |
2 | Policy & Regulation | Implementation of carbon fee mechanism. |
3 | Policy & Regulation | Planning of low-carbon energy policy. |
4 | Technology | R&D of carbon neutral technology of the steel industry. |
5 | Market | Changes in steel demand from downstream customers. |
6 | Policy & Regulation | Implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). |
7 | Acute | Extreme weather events, such as typhoons and floods (Raw materials). |
8 | Acute | Extreme weather events, such as typhoons and floods (Operations). |
9 | Chronic | Water shortages caused by changing climate patterns. |
10 | Reputation | Investors/Financial institutions’ willingness to invest in and provide loans to CSC. |
11 | Acute | Extreme heat/dry wildfire events(Raw materials). |
12 | Chronic | Rising sea levels causes the flooding of low-lying areas. |
Order of Priority | Category | Opportunity Factor |
---|---|---|
1 | Market | Entry to renewable energy/automotive related supply chains. |
2 | Products and Services | Provision of high-strength steel to enhance climate resilience. |
3 | Resource Efficiency | Reduction of crude steel energy consumption through smart manufacturing energy saving. |
4 | Products and Services | Provision of low-carbon steel products to downstream industries. |
5 | Market | Compliance with requirements of financial institutions to obtain low interest rates. |
6 | Energy Sources | Expansion of energy storage-related facilities. |
Every year, CSC entrusts a third-party agency certificated by the MOENV to verify CSC’s annual GHGs emission inventory, and obtains statement documents. GHG information of 2023 is shown below.
GHG emissions(Unit: tCO2e) | 2021(III) | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
Direct GHG emissions
(Scope 1) |
20,939,573 | 18,248,901 | 16,809,455 |
Indirect GHG emissions from imported energy
(Location-based Scope 2) |
1,357,456 | 1,373,685 | 1,263,333(VI) |
Indirect GHG emissions from imported energy
(Market-based Scope 2) |
1,357,456(III) | 1,373,673 | 1,249,102(VI) |
Total emissions(I)(II) | 22,297,029 | 19,622,574 | 18,058,557 |
Other Indirect Emissions
(Scope 3) |
12,055,837 | 11,216,225 | 11,317,609 |
(Unit: tCO2e) | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other indirect GHG emissions in total(Scope 3) | 12,055,837 | 11,216,225 | 11,317,609 | |
Indirect GHG emissions from transportation | Upstream transportation and distribution for goods(V) | 683,165.24 | 482,727.62 | 423,018.44 |
Business travels | 62.27 | 82.37 | 187.34 | |
Employee commuting | 5,037.38 | 5,005.56 | 4,984.61 | |
Downstream transportation and distribution for goods | 282,275.03 | 348,553.11 | 390,072.27 | |
Indirect GHG emissions from products used by an organization | Purchased goods and services | 144,440.62 | 147,361.03 | 125,993.17 |
Capital goods | 203.70 | 543.91 | 1,017.74 | |
Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) | 1,065,448.28 | 1,118,068.66 | 1,012,053.87 | |
Waste generated in operations | 2,323.32 | 5,263.81 | 1,408.56 | |
Upstream leased assets | 164.05 | 165.39 | 187.45 | |
Indirect GHG emissions associated with the use of products from the organization | Processing of sold products | 208,819.42 | 122,055.76 | 115,728.50 |
Use of sold products | 488.54 | 0 | 227.06 | |
End-of-life treatment of sold products | 52,283.00 | 5,366.03 | 5,636.75 | |
Downstream leased assets | 607.32 | 614.32 | 1,705.03 | |
Franchises | 778.49 | 931.04 | 716.72 | |
Investments | 9,609,740.49 | 8,979,486.07 | 9,234,671.21 |
CSC has set short-, medium-, and long-term carbon reduction goals. With the long-term goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050, CSC has preliminarily formulated a number of strategies and mapped its pathways towards carbon neutrality. In the short-term, CSC has mainly planned to increase the use of renewable energy and step up efforts to improve energy efficiency.It had completed 221carbon reduction action plans with carbon emissions reduced by 2.8% or 626,000 tons/year in 2022, and 223 carbon reduction action plans with carbon emissions reduced by 1.6% or 358,000 tons/year in 2023, respectively. As for the medium- and long-term pathways towards carbon neutrality, the goal of reducing carbon emissions will be reached by 25% in 2030 compared with that in 2018 by applying reduced iron to the blast furnaces, replacing coal injection with hydrogen, co-production between steel and petrochemical plants, increasing scrap use. There are four pathways towards carbon neutral after 2030, namely electrification of equipment, carbon-free fuels, CCUS, and hydrogen reduction process, with carbon reduction tasks in ten aspects.
CSC has established the “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Incentives program” to encourage employees from relevant departments (for example, the ironmaking, steelmaking, and engineering departments of CSC) to participate in carbon reduction activities.
CSC has also mapped out a two-stage pathway to ensure that it will achieve the goal of carbon neutrality. However, CSC currently lacks mature technology, hydrogen resources, and the need for equipment revamp, and it will eventually face challenges in three areas, namely, technology, resources, and costs, which are also similar to those faced by other steel mills globally. Therefore, CSC will actively engage in the R&D operations while continuously reviewing and adjusting the progress of each strategy with rolling wave planning.
In response to the trend of carbon pricing, CSC implements the internal carbon pricing as a corporate governance tool of carbon reduction. We periodically review the internal carbon pricing which is based on external carbon tax, expected carbon fee or the cost of carbon reduction, also dynamically adjusts to the plan of pathway to carbon neutrality and global climate policy.
Besides calculating carbon emission costs and conducting sensitivity analysis, internal carbon pricing is also able to effectively evaluate the benefits of capital expenditures or R&D expenses of carbon reduction. So that it has the advantage of effectively controlling the company's overall carbon emissions, and driving the improvement of internal operations and production processes, or development of technologies with lower carbon emissions.
CSC has formulated the “Carbon Trading and Management Regulations” in accordance with MOENV's rules and regulations as well as international practices, with the relevant operations incorporated into ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. Meanwhile, applications for GHG offset credits are submitted by the Environmental Protection Department at CSC to the competent authority. As of the end of 2023, CSC has 4.5021 million tonnes of CO2e in GHG offset credit balance.
In response to climate change, verifying and disclosing the carbon footprints of enterprises have gradually become major issues that stakeholders pay attention to. In order to update carbon footprint information and establish a more comprehensive carbon management mechanism, CSC has implemented and successfully completed the carbon footprint inventory of 23 major product categories, such as that of hot-rolled steel coils, with the joint efforts of all production units. It was granted an external verification opinion statement by BSI on November 23, 2022.
During the internal verification process, CSC was repeatedly faced with factors, such as the inconsistency of the sources of the supporting data. Therefore, it was necessary for CSC to establish an inventory management system that would link the existing information system to expedite the calculation of carbon footprints, reduce on-site workload of manpower, and then manage through the system, which was an important tool, by monitoring the statuses of carbon emissions in the production plants.
In response to the gradually emerging carbon tariffs and the trendy issue of carbon neutrality, various industrial companies with brand recognition have been competing to set carbon neutrality goals, and their supply chains have also responded by investing in establishing product carbon emission baselines and reducing carbon emissions. CSC, as a major international supplier of steel products, will continue to conduct carbon footprint verification to better understand the degree of carbon exposure. Furthermore, it will meet the expectations of the authorities, customers, and the supply chains, work collectively with the aforementioned parties in terms of sustainability and the reduction of carbon emissions, respond to inquiries from investors or customers, and understand carbon risk exposure.
Verification Opinion Statement
The carbon footprint of hot-rolled coils is 2.151 kgCO2e/kg.