The framework of CSC's climate governance is directly supervised by the Board of Directors, the top climate governance unit; the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee is the management unit. The Sustainable Environment Development Team and Risk Management Team of the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, composed of vice presidents of departments as conveners, are responsible for handling climate change issues faced by CSC and report their progress to the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee regularly based on the implementation results.
In response to carbon neutrality, the Task Force on Energy Saving & Carbon Reduction and Carbon Neutrality was established in February 2021 by CSC. The chairman of the Board is in charge of the oversight of climate change issues. The task force convenes quarterly and reports its progress to the Board of Directors regularly.
Dates | Summaries of progress |
---|---|
2021.02.26 |
|
2021.04.22 |
|
2021.06.21 |
|
2021.08.31 |
|
2021.10.27 |
|
2022.01.04 |
|
2022.02.22 |
|
2022.04.18 |
|
2022.07.20 |
|
2022.10.25 |
|
2023.01.12 |
|
2023.04.17 |
|
2023.07.26 |
|
2023.10.25 |
|
2024.01.30 |
|
2024.04.15 |
|
2024.07.04 |
|
2024.10.16 |
|
2024.01.16 |
|
2025.04.01 |
|
CSC identifies the risks and opportunities brought by climate change to all business units, thereby CSC is able to effectively respond to a wide range of issues arising from climate change. We also integrated climate-related risks into the company's overall risk management framework, please refer to the "Risk Management" for more details.
CSC continually monitors climate risks that may impact its operations, informed by its climate-related risk and opportunity assessment process, and stays informed of opportunities that could benefit climate change. For specific measures for each procedure, please refer to the following process:
To effectively understand the impact of climate change on its strategies and business goals, CSC conducts quantitative analysis and discussions under multiple climate scenarios. CSC's core business encompasses the upstream and downstream value chain of the steel industry. To further assess resilience and develop response measures, the following are details of CSC's scenario analysis approach:
Coverage of the value chain | Risk Category | Scenario selected | Time horizon | Scope of analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|
Major raw material suppliers | Transition risks-Market | IEA APS | 2025-2050 | Global |
Physical risks-Acute | SSP2-4.5 | Specific countries | ||
SSP5-8.5 | ||||
Government | Transition risks-Policy and regulation | IEA APS | Taiwan | |
CSC | Transition risks-Technology | IEA NZE | ||
Physical risks-Acute | SSP2-4.5 | |||
Physical risks-Chronic | SSP5-8.5 | |||
Customers | Transition risks-Market | IEA APS | Global |
CSC conducts scenario analysis of future occurrences of more frequent physical risks in the value chain, utilizing scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), specifically the high emissions scenario (SSP5-8.5) and the medium emissions scenario (SSP2-4.5). Leveraging the climate impact driver framework employed by the IPCC Working Group I, CSC identifies physical risks that the value chain may encounter. Based on climate scenario data and information on hazard risks, combined with assessment results from various locations, these values are consolidated into a climate risk matrix. CSC's analysis process of physical risks is as follows:
Based on the TCFD scenario analysis framework, CSC has summarized 7 transition risks, 5 physical risks, and 6 opportunity issues. Assessed by each risk identification department, the results are based on factors such as the time of occurrence, likelihood of occurrence, and degree of impact, which are then mapped into the climate-related risks and opportunities matrix; issues that surpassed the materiality threshold will be managed by CSC. Time horizons are defined as follows:
Time horizon | Timeline planning |
---|---|
Short-term (2025) | Considering that climate change issues that are mostly linked to CSC's carbon reduction and ESG targets, the short-term interval is set at one year |
Mid-term (2026-2030) | Based on the government's and CSC's mid-term carbon reduction targets, the mid-term interval is set at 2-6 years |
Long-term (2031-2050) | Actively aligning CSC's long-term carbon emission reduction goal with the government's net zero emission path, by setting a long-term goal for 2050 |
Order of Priority | Category | Risk Factor |
---|---|---|
1 | Market | Transition of raw materials. |
2 | Policy & Regulation | Implementation of carbon fee mechanism. |
3 | Policy & Regulation | Planning of low-carbon energy policy. |
4 | Technology | R&D of carbon neutral technology of the steel industry. |
5 | Market | Changes in steel demand from downstream customers. |
6 | Policy & Regulation | Implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). |
7 | Acute | Extreme weather events, such as typhoons and floods (Raw materials). |
8 | Acute | Extreme weather events, such as typhoons and floods (Operations). |
9 | Chronic | Water shortages caused by changing climate patterns. |
10 | Reputation | Investors/Financial institutions’ willingness to invest in and provide loans to CSC. |
11 | Acute | Extreme heat/dry wildfire events(Raw materials). |
12 | Chronic | Rising sea levels causes the flooding of low-lying areas. |
Order of Priority | Category | Opportunity Factor |
---|---|---|
1 | Market | Entry to renewable energy/automotive related supply chains. |
2 | Products and Services | Provision of high-strength steel to enhance climate resilience. |
3 | Resource Efficiency | Reduction of crude steel energy consumption through smart manufacturing energy saving. |
4 | Products and Services | Provision of low-carbon steel products to downstream industries. |
5 | Market | Compliance with requirements of financial institutions to obtain low interest rates. |
6 | Energy Sources | Expansion of energy storage-related facilities. |
Every year, CSC entrusts a third-party agency certificated by the MOENV to verify CSC's annual GHGs emission inventory, and obtains statement documents. GHG information of 2024 is shown below.
GHG emissions(Unit: tCO2e) | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|
Direct GHG emissions
(Scope 1) |
18,248,901 | 16,809,455 | 17,587,087 |
Indirect GHG emissions from imported energy
(Location-based Scope 2) |
1,373,685 | 1,263,333 | 1,182,375(V) |
Indirect GHG emissions from imported energy
(Market-based Scope 2) |
1,373,673 | 1,249,102 | 1,166,325(V) |
Total emissions(I)(II) | 19,622,574 | 18,058,557 | 18,753,412 |
Other Indirect Emissions
(Scope 3) |
11,216,225 | 11,317,609 | 11,036,798 |
(Unit: tCO2e) | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other indirect GHG emissions in total(Scope 3) | 11,216,225 | 11,317,609 | 11,036,798 | |
Indirect GHG emissions from transportation | Upstream transportation and distribution for goods(V) | 482,727.62 | 423,018.44 | 427,123.33 |
Business travels | 82.37 | 187.34 | 233.39 | |
Employee commuting | 5,005.56 | 4,984.61 | 4,944.37 | |
Downstream transportation and distribution for goods | 282,275.03 | 390,072.27 | 331,871.37 | |
Indirect GHG emissions from products used by an organization | Purchased goods and services | 147,361.03 | 125,993.17 | 101,937.13 |
Capital goods | 543.91 | 1,017.74 | 576.15 | |
Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) | 1,118,068.66 | 1,012,053.87 | 1,043,501.15 | |
Waste generated in operations | 5,263.81 | 1,408.56 | 1,114.36 | |
Upstream leased assets | 165.39 | 187.45 | 163.89 | |
Indirect GHG emissions associated with the use of products from the organization | Processing of sold products | 122,055.76 | 115,728.50 | 104,825.64 |
Use of sold products | 0 | 227.06 | 0 | |
End-of-life treatment of sold products | 5,366.03 | 5,636.75 | 5,636.75 | |
Downstream leased assets | 614.32 | 1,705.03 | 1,611.02 | |
Franchises | 931.04 | 716.72 | 690.43 | |
Investments | 8,979,486.07 | 9,234,671.21 | 9,012,569.32 |
CSC has set short-term, mid-term, and long-term carbon reduction targets. With the long-term target of achieving carbon neutral by 2050, CSC has preliminarily formulated a number of strategies and mapped its pathway towards carbon neutral. In the short-term, we mainly plan to increase the use of renewable energy and step up efforts to improve energy efficiency. We completed 223 carbon reduction action plans in 2023 and reduced carbon emissions by 1.6% compared to the base year of 2018 or 358,000 tonnes/year (scope 1 + scope 2). We completed 173 carbon reduction action plans in 2024 and reduced carbon emissions by 0.46% compared to the base year or 101,600 tonnes/year (scope 1 + scope 2). Between 2018 and 2024, a total of 1,281 carbon reduction action plans were executed, achieving an accumulated annual reduction of 1.5157 million tonnes of CO2e,corresponding to a 6.86% decrease from the baseline year.
As for the mid-term and long-term pathway towards carbon neutral, CSC has adopted a phased approach of “low-carbon transition” followed by “net-zero transformation.” We will reach the target of reducing carbon emissions in 2030 by 25% compared to 2018 (scope 1 and 2) by "Charge low carbon ferrous burden into BF," "replacing coal injection with hydrogen," "coproduction between steel and petrochemical plants," and "increasing scrap use." There are 4 pathways towards carbon neutral after 2030, namely electrification, carbon-free fuels, CCUS, and hydrogen reduction process, with carbon reduction tasks in 10 aspects. CSC will achieve its carbon neutral target by 2050, demonstrating its commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development.
CSC has established the “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Incentives program” to encourage employees from relevant departments (for example, the ironmaking, steelmaking, and engineering departments of CSC) to participate in carbon reduction activities.
To achieve carbon neutrality, CSC has established a two-phase medium- and long-term roadmap. As an integrated steel producer, CSC relies on coke as both a reducing agent and energy source, resulting in significantly higher carbon intensity compared to electric arc furnace operations. Economic and resource limitations, such as large equipment investments, high transition costs, and limited access to mature technology and green energy, constrain the widespread short-term application of hydrogen metallurgy and carbon capture technologies, despite their carbon reduction potential. In addition, raw material supply restrictions and market competition have compounded existing challenges. Therefore, similar to other steel mills worldwide, CSC currently encounters a number of problems in some of its strategies, such as a lack of mature technology and hydrogen resources and the need for equipment revamp, and will eventually face challenges in three areas-technology, resources, and capitals. Through active investment in R&D and ongoing cross-departmental collaboration, CSC will research, evaluate, and implement the most feasible carbon reduction strategies for the steel industry, with adjustments made on a rolling basis based on reviews.
CSC is committed to climate action and has implemented an Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) mechanism as part of sustainable development. Adopting the shadow pricing method, CSC has set an ICP TWD 300 per tonne of CO2e emissions, in alignment with the Carbon Fee Collection Regulations issued by the Ministry of Environment. CSC also periodically reviews ICP and considers following factors:
The ICP serves as a corporate governance tool to drive carbon reduction efforts. The implementation scope covers GHG Scope 1 and Scope 2. Objectives for implementing ICP include as follows:
The ICP is applied to make business decisions related to capital expenditure, production planning, procurement, product development and risk management by internalizing the cost of carbon emissions, so that CSC could evaluate the total cost and benefit of the climate-related projects. It also urges CSC to strengthen lower-carbon strategies and execute process improvement projects thanks to it benefits to cost reduction. All things considered, the implementation of ICP is conducive to enhancing internal carbon reduction performance, advancing a planned effort to execute carbon emissions control, and contributing to CSC's climate-related policies and targets of carbon emissions reduction and sustainable development.
CSC has formulated the “Carbon Trading and Management Regulations” in accordance with MOENV's rules and regulations as well as international practices, with the relevant operations incorporated into ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. Meanwhile, applications for GHG offset credits are submitted by the Environmental Protection Department at CSC to the competent authority. As of the end of 2024, CSC has 4.4886 million tonnes of CO2e in GHG offset credit balance.
In response to climate change, verifying and disclosing the carbon footprints of enterprises have gradually become major issues that stakeholders pay attention to. In order to update carbon footprint information and establish a more comprehensive carbon management mechanism, CSC has implemented and successfully completed the carbon footprint inventory of 23 major product categories, such as that of hot-rolled steel coils, with the joint efforts of all production units. It was granted an external verification opinion statement by BSI on November 23, 2022.
During the internal verification process, CSC was repeatedly faced with factors, such as the inconsistency of the sources of the supporting data. Therefore, it was necessary for CSC to establish an inventory management system that would link the existing information system to expedite the calculation of carbon footprints, reduce on-site workload of manpower, and then manage through the system, which was an important tool, by monitoring the statuses of carbon emissions in the production plants.
In response to the gradually emerging carbon tariffs and the trendy issue of carbon neutrality, various industrial companies with brand recognition have been competing to set carbon neutrality goals, and their supply chains have also responded by investing in establishing product carbon emission baselines and reducing carbon emissions. CSC, as a major international supplier of steel products, will continue to conduct carbon footprint verification to better understand the degree of carbon exposure. Furthermore, it will meet the expectations of the authorities, customers, and the supply chains, work collectively with the aforementioned parties in terms of sustainability and the reduction of carbon emissions, respond to inquiries from investors or customers, and understand carbon risk exposure.
Verification Opinion Statement
The carbon footprint of hot-rolled coils is 2.151 kgCO2e/kg.