The framework of CSC's climate governance is directly supervised by the Board of Directors, the top climate governance unit; the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee is the management unit. The Sustainable Environment Development Team and Risk Management Team of the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, composed of vice presidents of departments as conveners, are responsible for handling climate change issues faced by CSC and report their progress to the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee regularly based on the implementation results.
In response to carbon neutrality, the Task Force on Energy Saving & Carbon Reduction and Carbon Neutrality was established in February 2021 by CSC. The chairman of the Board is in charge of the oversight of climate change issues. The task force convenes quarterly and reports its progress to the Board of Directors regularly.
| Important schedule | Abstract |
|---|---|
| 2024.04.15 |
|
| 2024.07.04 |
|
| 2024.10.16 |
|
| 2025.01.16 |
|
| 2025.04.01 |
|
| 2025.07.03 |
|
| 2025.10.07 |
|
| 2026.01.06 |
|
| 2026.04.17 |
|
CSC identifies the risks and opportunities brought by climate change to all business units, thereby CSC is able to effectively respond to a wide range of issues arising from climate change. We also integrated climate-related risks into the company's overall risk management framework, please refer to the "Risk Management" for more details.
CSC continually monitors climate risks that may impact its operations, informed by its climate-related risk and opportunity assessment process, and stays informed of opportunities that could benefit climate change. For specific measures for each procedure, please refer to the following process:
To effectively assess the impact of climate change on its strategies direction and operational goals, CSC conducts quantitative scenario-based analyses and discussions focused on its core business, which encompasses the entire upstream and downstream value chain of the steel industry. This process aims to strengthen operational resilience and facilitate the formulation of proactive response measures. Detailed below is CSC's specific approach to scenario analysis
| Coverage of the value chain | Risk Category | Scenario selected | Time horizon | Scope of analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major raw material suppliers | Transition risks-Market | IEA STEPS、IEA NZE | 2025-2050 | Global |
| Physical risks-Acute | SSP2-4.5 | Specific countries | ||
| SSP5-8.5 | ||||
| Government | Transition risks-Policy and regulation | IEA STEPS、IEA NZE | Taiwan | |
| CSC | Transition risks-Technology | IEA STEPS、IEA NZE | ||
| Physical risks-Acute | SSP2-4.5 SSP5-8.5 |
|||
| Physical risks-Chronic | ||||
| Customers | Transition risks-Market | IEA STEPS、IEA NZE | Global |
CSC referenced the World Energy Outlook 2025 (WEO 2025) research report published by the International Energy Agency (IEA) to evaluate technological transition pathways and market trends within the global steel industry. Specifically, CSC utilized parameters from the Net Zero Emissions (NZE) and Stated Policies Scenarios (STEPS) to serve as the basis for discussing its strategic transition planning.
In this climate scenario analysis, CSC has focused on the two primary policy scenarios mentioned above. Beyond re-evaluating the assumptions of STEPS, CSC has conducted more rigorous simulations under then NZE scenario to deeply explore its operational resilience. CSC analyzes key transition drivers, such as carbon pricing and the breadth of policy coverage, and integrates these factors with corporate strategies and operational goals as a basis for identifying subsequent risks and opportunities.
| Climate scenario | Steel demand | Carbon pricing | Breadth of policy coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| IEA NZE | Overall growth is sustained, though the magnitude of growth varies slightly between scenarios. | Global carbon prices remain high, providing a sufficient incentive to drive the widespread adoption of clean technologies. | National policies are increasingly converging toward a unified framework. |
| IEA STEPS | Prices in advanced economies remain higher. | Policy stances continue to exhibit a degree of divergence across various nations. |
CSC conducts scenario analysis of potential future physical risks in the value chain, utilizing scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), specifically the high emissions scenario (SSP5-8.5) and the intermediate emissions scenario (SSP2-4.5). The analysis process is divided into three stages: First, CSC utilizes the IPCC Working Group I (WGI) Climatic Impact-Driver Framework to identify potential risk factors. Second, by referencing climate scenario data, such as the Taiwan Climate Change Projection Information and Adaptation Knowledge Platform (TCCIP), and disaster risk information, CSC evaluates the degree of impact in conjunction with the specific operational characteristics of each department. Finally, the results are consolidated into a climate risk matrix, and planned adaptation measures are implemented as necessary. Regarding the identified acute and chronic physical risks, an overview of each climate-related disaster is provided below.
Based on the TCFD scenario analysis framework, CSC has summarized 7 transition risks, 5 physical risks, and 7 opportunity issues. Assessed by each risk identification department, the results are based on factors such as the time of occurrence, likelihood of occurrence, and degree of impact, which are then mapped into the climate-related risks and opportunities matrix; issues that surpassed the materiality threshold will be managed by CSC.
| Order of Priority | Category | Risk Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Technology | R&D of carbon neutral technology of the steel industry. |
| 2 | Market | Transition of raw materials. |
| 3 | Technology | Planning of low-carbon energy policy. |
| 4 | Policy & regulation | Implementation of the carbon fee mechanism. |
| 5 | Policy & regulation | Insufficient support for climate transition policies leads to competitive risks. |
| 6 | Acute | Extreme weather events, such as typhoons, floods, and wildfires (raw materials) |
| 7 | Reputation | Investors/Financial institutions' willingness to invest in and provide loans to CSC. |
| 8 | Chronic | Extreme high heat affect power stability. |
| 9 | Market | Changes in steel demand from downstream customers. |
| 10 | Acute | Extreme weather events, such as typhoons and floods (operations) |
| 11 | Chronic | Water shortages caused by changing climate patterns. |
| 12 | Chronic | Rising sea levels leading to flooding in ports due to storm surges. |
| Order of Priority | Category | Opportunity Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Products and services | Provide high-strength structural steel to enhance climate resilience. |
| 2 | Resource efficiency | Reduce product energy consumption through smart processes and energy saving.. |
| 3 | Market | Develop motor vehicle/renewable electricity related material supply chains. |
| 4 | Products and services | Provide low carbon steel products to downstream industries. |
| 5 | Market | Participate in carbon trading market. |
| 6 | Energy sources | Expand renewable electricity and energy storage related facilities. |
| 7 | Market | Comply with requirements of financial institutions to obtain low interest rates. |
Every year, CSC entrusts a third-party agency certificated by the MOENV to verify CSC's annual GHGs emission inventory, and obtains statement documents. GHG information of 2025 is shown below.
| GHG emissions(Unit: tCO2e) | 2022 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct GHG emissions
(Scope 1) |
16,809,455 | 17,587,087 | 16,374,784 |
| Indirect GHG emissions from imported energy
(Location-based Scope 2) |
1,263,333 | 1,182,375(V) | 1,127,031 |
| Indirect GHG emissions from imported energy
(Market-based Scope 2) |
1,249,102 | 1,166,325(V) | 1,140,354 |
| Total emissions(I)(II) | 18,058,557 | 18,753,412 | 17,515,138 |
| Other Indirect Emissions
(Scope 3) |
11,317,609 | 11,036,798 | 9,321,881 |
| (Unit: tCO2e) | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other indirect GHG emissions in total(Scope 3) | 11,317,609 | 11,036,798 | 9,321,881 | |
| Indirect GHG emissions from transportation | Upstream transportation and distribution for goods(V) | 423,018.44 | 427,123.33 | 444,658.45 |
| Business travels | 187.34 | 233.39 | 316.51 | |
| Employee commuting | 4,984.61 | 4,944.37 | 4,752.10 | |
| Downstream transportation and distribution for goods | 390,072.27 | 331,871.37 | 192,896.34 | |
| Indirect GHG emissions from products used by an organization | Purchased goods and services | 125,993.17 | 101,937.13 | 123,318.27 |
| Capital goods | 1,017.74 | 576.15 | 260.53 | |
| Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) | 1,012,053.87 | 1,043,501.15 | 1,043,056.48 | |
| Waste generated in operations | 1,408.56 | 1,114.36 | 1,357.00 | |
| Upstream leased assets | 187.45 | 163.89 | 156.94 | |
| Indirect GHG emissions associated with the use of products from the organization | Processing of sold products | 115,728.50 | 104,825.64 | 92,286.80 |
| Use of sold products | 227.06 | 0 | 0 | |
| End-of-life treatment of sold products | 5,636.75 | 2,975.67 | 2,483.61 | |
| Downstream leased assets | 1,705.03 | 1,611.02 | 1,416.21 | |
| Franchises | 716.72 | 690.43 | 648.09 | |
| Investments | 9,234,671.21 | 9,012,569.32 | 7,414,273.14 | |
In response to global carbon neutral challenges and evolving market dynamics, CSC has launched its "Dual Cores and Three Transformations" management strategy. With a primary focus on developing Advanced premium steel plants and the development of green technology and energy resources, the strategy drives three critical pivots: digital transformation, low-carbon transformation, and supply chain transformation. Regarding its low-carbon transformation practices, CSC has set carbon reduction targets, with a long-term goal of achieving carbon neutral by 2050, and has formulated various strategies to map out its carbon neutral roadmap.
Based on comprehensive technical and resource feasibility assessments, CSC has mapped out practical carbon reduction measures to continuously refine its pathway towards carbon neutral. Aligning with Taiwan's carbon fee system implemented in 2025 and referencing the " Industry-Specific Reduction Rates " under the SBTi spirit, CSC has selected 2021 as its base year. During the period from 2025 to 2030, CSC will deploy seven core carbon reduction measures: "Renewable Energy," "Improve energy Efficiency," "Increasing Scrap Use," " Charge Low Carbon Ferrous Burden Into Blast Furnace," " Switching Cogeneration Boilers To Low-carbon Fuels," " Improving Energy Efficiency Via Equipment Addition Or Replacement," and " Co-production Between Steel And Petrochemical Plants." Through these measures, CSC has set a target to achieve a 25.3% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2030 compared to the 2021 base year, with Scope 2 calculated using the market-based method and the target encompassing biogenic CO2 emissions.
Furthermore, the long-term planning toward carbon neutral will be driven by five forward-looking strategies: " Replace coal injection with hydrogen," " Electrification," "Carbon-Free Fuels," "CCUS," and " Hydrogen Reduction Process." Aiming to achieve carbon neutral by 2050, CSC demonstrates its resolute commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development.
In 2025, CSC completed 178 carbon reduction action plans, achieving an annual carbon reduction of 71,500 metric tons of CO2e (Scope 1 + Scope 2). From 2021 to 2025, a cumulative total of 1,046 carbon reduction action plans were completed, resulting in an annual reduction of 1.4516 million metric tons of CO2e (Scope 1 + Scope 2), representing a 6.51% decrease compared to the 2021 base year.
CSC has established the “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Incentives program” to encourage employees from relevant departments (for example, the ironmaking, steelmaking, and engineering departments of CSC) to participate in carbon reduction activities.
To achieve carbon neutrality, CSC has established a two-phase medium- and long-term roadmap. As an integrated steel producer, CSC relies on coke as both a reducing agent and energy source, resulting in significantly higher carbon intensity compared to electric arc furnace operations. Economic and resource limitations, such as large equipment investments, high transition costs, and limited access to mature technology and green energy, constrain the widespread short-term application of hydrogen metallurgy and carbon capture technologies, despite their carbon reduction potential. In addition, raw material supply restrictions and market competition have compounded existing challenges. Therefore, similar to other steel mills worldwide, CSC currently encounters a number of problems in some of its strategies, such as a lack of mature technology and hydrogen resources and the need for equipment revamp, and will eventually face challenges in three areas-technology, resources, and capitals. Through active investment in R&D and ongoing cross-departmental collaboration, CSC will research, evaluate, and implement the most feasible carbon reduction strategies for the steel industry, with adjustments made on a rolling basis based on reviews. Currently, CSC does not intend to use carbon offsets as a strategy for carbon neutrality.
CSC is committed to the principles of a just transition as it moves forward with its low-carbon transformation, and it is aware of the possible effects the transformation may have on employees. For employees, CSC adheres to the spirit of continuous improvement in human capital. In addition to the routine skills training provided, when organizational adjustments or production line restructuring occur, CSC will assist employees in finding suitable job positions and provide relevant training to help them adapt to the adjusted job responsibilities or work arrangements.
Regarding retraining and career transition support, CSC promotes mandatory training for key positions within each unit and provides an e-Learning platform to effectively deliver skills, knowledge, and experience transfer, helping employees quickly understand new job content and work methods or processes.
The support measures for adjustments to employee working conditions arising from the company's transformation process are also reflected in the spirit of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, specifically Article 48, signed between CSC and the China Steel Corporation Labor Union. Through the existing governance framework and cross-department coordination mechanisms, CSC gradually integrates human resource development and communication support into the overall planning to mitigate transformation risks and strengthen organizational resilience.
CSC is committed to climate action and has implemented an Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) mechanism as part of sustainable development. Adopting the shadow pricing method, CSC has set an ICP TWD 300 per tonne of CO2e emissions, in alignment with the Carbon Fee Collection Regulations issued by the Ministry of Environment. CSC also periodically reviews ICP and considers following factors:
The ICP serves as a corporate governance tool to drive carbon reduction efforts. The implementation scope covers GHG Scope 1 and Scope 2. Objectives for implementing ICP include as follows:
The ICP is applied to make business decisions related to capital expenditure, production planning, procurement, product development and risk management by internalizing the cost of carbon emissions, so that CSC could evaluate the total cost and benefit of the climate-related projects. It also urges CSC to strengthen lower-carbon strategies and execute process improvement projects thanks to it benefits to cost reduction. All things considered, the implementation of ICP is conducive to enhancing internal carbon reduction performance, advancing a planned effort to execute carbon emissions control, and contributing to CSC's climate-related policies and targets of carbon emissions reduction and sustainable development.
CSC has formulated the “Carbon Trading and Management Regulations” in accordance with MOENV's rules and regulations as well as international practices, with the relevant operations incorporated into ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. Meanwhile, applications for GHG offset credits are submitted by the Environmental Protection Department at CSC to the competent authority. As of the end of 2025, CSC has 4.532 million tonnes of CO2e in GHG offset credit balance.
In response to climate change, verifying and disclosing the carbon footprints of enterprises have gradually become major issues that stakeholders pay attention to. In order to update carbon footprint information and establish a more comprehensive carbon management mechanism, CSC has implemented and successfully completed the carbon footprint inventory of 22 major product categories, such as that of hot-rolled steel coils, with the joint efforts of all production units. It was granted an external verification opinion statement by BSI on December 25, 2025.
During the internal verification process, CSC was repeatedly faced with factors, such as the inconsistency of the sources of the supporting data. Therefore, it was necessary for CSC to establish an inventory management system that would link the existing information system to expedite the calculation of carbon footprints, reduce on-site workload of manpower, and then manage through the system, which was an important tool, by monitoring the statuses of carbon emissions in the production plants.
In response to the gradually emerging carbon tariffs and the trendy issue of carbon neutrality, various industrial companies with brand recognition have been competing to set carbon neutrality goals, and their supply chains have also responded by investing in establishing product carbon emission baselines and reducing carbon emissions. CSC, as a major international supplier of steel products, will continue to conduct carbon footprint verification to better understand the degree of carbon exposure. Furthermore, it will meet the expectations of the authorities, customers, and the supply chains, work collectively with the aforementioned parties in terms of sustainability and the reduction of carbon emissions, respond to inquiries from investors or customers, and understand carbon risk exposure.
Verification Opinion Statement
The carbon footprint of hot-rolled coils is 2.219 kgCO2e/kg.